?

"SubZer0" wrote in message
m...
?

Well it up to you to post something sensible.
Regards
David

"David" wrote in message
...


"SubZer0" wrote in message
m...
?

Well it up to you to post something sensible.
Regards
David

I intend to...once I've established that there is, at least a handful of
moderately competent contributors.

SubZer0 wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...


"SubZer0" wrote in message
m...
?

Well it up to you to post something sensible.
Regards
David

I intend to...once I've established that there is, at least a handful of
moderately competent contributors.



Just ask your question. If you don't get a suitable answer cut & paste
it somewhere else.

-Kevin.

--
Confessions of a Starving Author
http://www.stanleyrumm.com

"Gunther Gloop" wrote in message
...
SubZer0 wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...


"SubZer0" wrote in message
m...
?

Well it up to you to post something sensible.
Regards
David

I intend to...once I've established that there is, at least a handful of
moderately competent contributors.



Just ask your question. If you don't get a suitable answer cut & paste it
somewhere else.

I haven't got a question...

On 27/01/2010 14:17, SubZer0 wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...


"SubZer0" wrote in message
m...
?

Well it up to you to post something sensible.
Regards
David

I intend to...once I've established that there is, at least a handful of
moderately competent contributors.

It works the other way around, you post something moderately interesting
and see if people respond.

--
Tony Evans
Saving trees and wasting electrons since 1993
blog - http://perceptionistruth.com/
olmr - http://www.onelinemoviereviews.co.uk/
[ anything below this line wasn't written by me ]

"Tony" wrote in message
...
On 27/01/2010 14:17, SubZer0 wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...


"SubZer0" wrote in message
m...
?

Well it up to you to post something sensible.
Regards
David

I intend to...once I've established that there is, at least a handful of
moderately competent contributors.

It works the other way around, you post something moderately interesting
and see if people respond.

Then it clearly doesn't work at all.
You appear to have created the perfect 'Catch 22' scenario here with all
your attempted 'trying to be cleverness'.

So, here is my one and only question to this group, how do I know if my post
is 'moderately interesting' *before* I post it?

Anyway, the question I didn't ask has been answered - What sort of people
inhabit this newsgroup?
Thanks for all your obtuse, sarcastic and irrelevant pedantry, I will be
seeking advice from a less antagonistic source.

.....and I now know why this group appears dead; Archives of this group show
8 spam messages and just 2 legitimate questions since 01/11/09 - not exactly
'buzzing' is it.

On 30/01/2010 09:18, SubZer0 wrote:

Then it clearly doesn't work at all.
You appear to have created the perfect 'Catch 22' scenario here with all
your attempted 'trying to be cleverness'.

So, here is my one and only question to this group, how do I know if my
post is 'moderately interesting' *before* I post it?

Anyway, the question I didn't ask has been answered - What sort of
people inhabit this newsgroup?
Thanks for all your obtuse, sarcastic and irrelevant pedantry, I will be
seeking advice from a less antagonistic source.

....and I now know why this group appears dead; Archives of this group
show 8 spam messages and just 2 legitimate questions since 01/11/09 -
not exactly 'buzzing' is it.

Ah, you were just trolling, okay, np.

--
Tony Evans
Saving trees and wasting electrons since 1993
blog - http://perceptionistruth.com/
olmr - http://www.onelinemoviereviews.co.uk/
[ anything below this line wasn't written by me ]